(pg. 114)

... as we search for the whole truth about someone, we will be able to see more clearly how God would have us vote.

This might seem a minor point to finally locate an issue I take with Hunter's view. But I believe there's something that underscores this point. Namely, that it's remarkably difficult and often impossible to arrive at an understanding of "the whole truth" about an issue or a person. Similarly, I'm thoroughly convinced that if we do so (or, more accurate to my understanding, as we begin to approach that point), I'm even less sure that clarity is what we get.

"The whole truth" is something that I argue isn't in our realm to understand. It's in God's. That leaves us struggling to decipher the clues we're given. And no matter how many you have, it's not enough to claim the whole truth ... regardless of what the bailiff made you swear to on a Bible in a courtroom.

Making my way a tad slower in the second half of the book, but I'm hoping to put it to rest this weekend. This exception aside, it's a remarkably great read and certainly very thought-provoking whatever your political views. I'll probably feel compelled to wrap up with some litany of things I disagree with about Hunter's thesis, so for now, let the plaudits be duly noted. Even in disagreement, Hunter is a model of civility, understanding, and compassion. That's evident in his sermons and public appearances ... so no great surprise to see it on full display in his writing, as well.